no combinations is there because a number divisible by 36
also divisible by its divisors anu.sum of 4 digits=20,whis
is not multiple of 3.so it is cannot divisible by 3
B, 8mm x 5 mm = 40 mm^2
1000mm x 1000mm = 1,000,000mm^2
= 1,000,000 mm^2/40mm^2
= 25,000
9 sec=4 times
x sec=12 times
x=(9*12)/4=27 sec
385, 462, 572, 396, 427, 671, 264
427 is the answer
Because
385 means (3+5=8) or (8-3=5) ,
462 means (4+2=6) or (6-2=4) ,
572 means (5+2=7) or (7-5=2) ,
396 means (6+3=9) or (9-3=6) ,
671 means (6+1=7) or (7-6=1) ,
264 means (4+2=6) or (6-2=4) ,
but only 427 is the number in which if we do addition of any of its two digits (e.g 4+2 or 4+7) then its answer doesn’t come 3rd digit
like if we do 4+2 then answer will be 6 so the number should be 426 but it is not
or if we do 7-4 then answer will be 3 (not 2)
so the right answer is 427
That person’s struggle and dream to achieve something motivates the person.
79
brother and sister
145.2
– While the train is moving, the jogger will also be running in the same direction.
– for the head(engine) of the train to get to the current position of the jogger 240m away, it will take:
45km/hr => 12.5m/s => 240/12.5 = 19.2 seconds.
– But in the same period of time, the jogger will still be running and will have moved to a new location by: 9km/hr => 2.5m/s => 2.5 * 19.2 = 48m
To get to the new location at the speed of 12.5m/s will take the train:
48/12.5 = 3.84sec
In this additional time, the jogger will move forward by:
3.84 * 2.5 = 9.6m
at a speed of 12.5m/s, it will take the train less than a second to cover the additional 9.6m
If we add the distance the jogger will cover in 1 second to 9.6, it is still less than what the train can cover per second. let us see (9.6 + 2.5 = 12.1)
Therefore, the head of the train will pass the runner at approximately: 19.2 + 3.84 + 1 => 24.04 seconds.
For the train to completely pass the runner, it will need its whole length of 120m to be in front of the runner.
This will take an additional (9.6 + 2) seconds.
Therefore for the length of the train to be ahead of the runner it will take approx. 35.65 (24.04 + 9.6 + 2) seconds
wake up guys and see modulo % can return only integer value.
So answer will be 1 and all other answers are wrong. You can
run your equation in C code and check the output.
34